If you're struggling to understand the terminology used in legal codes or complaint procedures, you can use our free Legal Jargon Translator.
However, if you have a complaint about a solicitor the first point of contact is generally with the Legal Complaints Service.
Both barristers and solicitors have positions of authority and must maintain their integrity at all times. Solicitors must not behave in a way that would diminish the trust the public has in the profession, and barristers must not do anything that is likely to bring the Bar (the collective term for barristers) into disrepute.
Duties
One of the fundamental differences between barristers and solicitors is the difference in the duties they owe to their clients. A solicitor’s duty is to his or her client, and they must act in the client’s best interests at all times. This duty is not all-encompassing however and there are certain situations in which a solicitor cannot continue to represent someone, for example if continuing to represent the client would mean breaking the law.
However, a barrister has a duty not only to his or her client but an equal duty to the court. For example a barrister cannot knowingly tell the court something that he knows to be wrong or untrue. If there is a conflict between the client’s instructions, and the barrister’s duty to the court, the barrister must in most circumstances withdraw from the case on the grounds that he is ‘professionally embarrassed’. There are only limited circumstances in which he is allowed to continue to act.
Paste any legal text and get a plain English explanation.
Try our Legal Jargon Translator free, here on this site →Confidentiality & Legal Professional Privilege
One of the most important aspects of the lawyer-client relationship is confidentiality. If a client did not think that he could speak freely and therefore withheld information about their case, a lawyer may not be able to provide accurate or appropriate advice.
The concept of confidentiality is the basis on which a lawyer is able to cite legal professional privilege for not disclosing information or the nature of communications to any other party. This applies, even during court proceedings, unless:
- the privileged status has been waived by the parties
- the information constitutes a criminal act or acts
- the information breaches professional rules.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Discrimination
Barristers and solicitors cannot discriminate against anyone, and must observe anti-discrimination legislation at all times. This includes directly or indirectly discriminating against someone on the grounds of colour, sex, race, age, religion or nationality. The barristers’ ‘cab rank rule’ reflects this. This rule requires them to accept cases regardless of the identity or nature of the case against their client.
Client Money
Unlike barristers, solicitors are able to hold clients’ money. However, there are rules that must be observed in relation to this. A solicitor must have a separate client account and not use clients’ funds for any other purpose. To do otherwise would be a serious breach of the solicitors’ code of conduct.
The magistrates awarded me compensation of £476.34 which has not been paid by the solicitor - defendant. During proceedings he actually, when asked by the magistrates why he had failed to report, was this a financial issue, boasted that "£500 is nothing to me". Surely this is dishonourable conduct by a solicitor to not pay the compensation owed and furthermore does this not bring the profession into disrepute?
in court the defendants solicitor and barrister both lied in a big way i never had good representation in court
the lies that the defendants barrister and his answers to the judge where not questioned by my barrister even after i told him what had happened with the second car
it was on that that i lost my case inturn lost money i should have been awarded
I have never been disrespectable in Court and have always treated the various Outer and Inner House Judges with respect but sadly my pleadinsg fall on deaf ears. In short how can a PL get listtened to. I am an Exploisves Engineer with almost 40 years experience and have no problem speaking to and lecturing large groups of people - far in excess of the ammount one has to address in court.
I do not tell lies, indeed my profession is not a liers profession.
I write out alll my pleadings, submit them to the Bench beforehand and then speak to the same when making my pleadings. I have even been complimented by some judges and on 2 occasioin actually guided by the bench but sadly lmbasted by others.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I am 65 and to unwell to consider trying for a law degree
John Parkes Explosives Engineer and Inventor.
Ask Courtroom Advice a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.