What is the small claims track?
The small claims track is a way of resolving civil disputes without the expense and formality of a full court hearing. Despite the name, it is not a separate court. It is one of three tracks used by the county court to handle cases, with each track suited to different levels of financial value and legal complexity.
The small claims track is designed for straightforward disputes, typically involving sums of £10,000 or less. The process is intended to be accessible to ordinary people without legal representation, though you can use a solicitor if you wish.
The other two tracks are the fast track, for moderately complex cases worth between £10,000 and £25,000, and the multi track, for higher value or more complicated matters. A judge decides which track your case should follow after you submit your claim.

Find the right court form for your situation. Family, civil, criminal and tribunal forms.
Try our Court Form Finder free, here on this site →Which cases can be dealt with as small claims?
Most money disputes up to £10,000 can be handled on the small claims track. Common examples include unpaid invoices, faulty goods, poor quality services, and disputes over deposits.
Some other types of case may also qualify:
- Personal injury claims where the amount claimed specifically for pain, suffering and loss of amenity is no more than £1,000. Other parts of the claim, such as vehicle damage or lost earnings, count towards the overall £10,000 limit but are assessed separately from the injury element.
- Housing disrepair claims brought by residential tenants against landlords, where the cost of repairs is no more than £1,000 and any other damages claimed do not exceed £10,000.
- Disputes over goods or services that did not meet reasonable standards.
The financial value of your claim is only one factor. If the judge considers your case legally complex or likely to need extensive evidence, it may be moved to a different track. This matters because the cost rules change significantly on the other tracks.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Costs and risks
One of the main features of the small claims track is that each side usually pays their own costs, regardless of who wins. This means that if you lose, you will not normally have to pay the other side's solicitor fees. This reduces the financial exposure compared to other types of court action, though it does not eliminate risk entirely.
You will still need to pay a court fee to issue your claim. The amount depends on how much you are claiming. Current fee levels are published on GOV.UK. If you win, the court may order the other party to reimburse this fee, though this remains at the judge's discretion.
There are some limited exceptions to the usual cost protection. The court can award costs against a party who has behaved unreasonably, for example by ignoring court directions or making false statements. Witness expenses and certain other minor costs may also be recoverable.
A more significant concern arises if your case is moved to a different track. On the fast track or multi track, the losing party will typically be ordered to pay the winner's legal costs. These can be substantial. If you think your dispute might be more complicated than it first appears, it is worth getting advice before you begin.
How the process works
You start a claim by completing a form, either online through the Money Claims Online service or by filling in a paper form and sending it to the court. You will need to set out clearly what you are claiming and why.
The other party then has a set period to respond. They may admit the claim, dispute it, or make a counterclaim against you. If the claim is defended, a judge will review the papers and allocate the case to the appropriate track.
Hearings for small claims are usually informal. They often take place in a private room rather than a traditional courtroom, with the judge, both parties and any witnesses seated around a table. The strict rules of evidence that apply in higher courts are relaxed, and the judge will typically ask questions directly rather than relying on formal examination of witnesses. Many small claims can be decided on paper without a hearing, if both parties agree and the judge considers it appropriate.
You do not need a solicitor to bring or defend a small claim. The process is designed for people to represent themselves. That said, if your case involves legal points you are unsure about, or the other side has instructed a lawyer, getting some advice beforehand may be worthwhile.
Winning a judgment does not always mean you will receive payment. If the other party does not pay voluntarily, you may need to take further enforcement action. Options include applying for an attachment of earnings order, a warrant of control to send bailiffs, or a charging order against property. Each of these involves additional court fees and procedures.
Citizens Advice can provide free guidance on court procedures. The GOV.UK website has current information on fees, forms, and the claims process.
We had a contract for windows to be replaced and fixed. The company undertaking the work went beyond what we asked for on some of the windows (doing more fixing/replacing than we'd asked for). We're now being charged for this extra labour, even though it wasn't in the contract (it was an error from the builder who misread the contract) and we weren't asked at the time/during the repairs whether we were happy for this unintentional work to be undertaken. We are being threatened with small claims court for non-payment of this additional labour. Does the company stand a chance of winning, even though the extra labour mistakenly done was not in the original contract?
This company did not sponsor me to come to work for them, and I was not explained about these terms when I started working.
The amount due to me might be above £500, is it worth taking this to small claim Court.
Please I would like to hear an advice on this matter.
Thank you
Thanks
I have taken my ex employer to an ET. Hearing due 21.07.21. My claim is about unpaid holidays since 2007.
They made me an offer to settle the claim that I have refused.
I am NOW thinking to withdraw my claim, and submit a new one to the small claim court as it seems there are less limitations/restrictions.
I would like to know if I can make a claim for unpaid holidays in the small claim court, and how many years can I claim for a back pay ?
Thank you
I have taken my ex employer to an ET. Hearing due 21.07.21. My claim is about unpaid holidays since 2007.
They made me an offer to settle the claim that I have refused.
I am not thinking to withdraw my claim, and submit a new one to the small claim court as it seems there are less limitations/restrictions.
I would like to know if I can make a claim for unpaid holidays in the small claim court, and how many years can I claim for a back pay ?
Thank you
We have a strong case however he is a one man band who i believe is self employed by advertises having business insurance, if we take him to court i know he has nothing in his name and will claim that he cannot pay, is it worth taking him to court in the hope that his insurance will pay out or are we throwing bad money after bad money?
Thanks,
Sam
A travel agent is threatening to take my mother and I to court for £450 to recoup cancellation costs for flight tickets that my mother never instructed them to book in the first place. They then tried intimidating my mother into payment by withholding passports and coerced into accepting an amedment. However how is she liable for any costs when she did not instruct them to make a booking in the first place. Grateful for any advise. Thank you.
Is there a time limit on being able to make a claim regardless of the detail?
Wendy
I wondered if I could still file a claim with no correct address or how I could find the new address. I have read about tracing agencies.
I don’t want to lose more money making a claim that won’t go anywhere.
Thanks
I have a court hearing monday I cannot attend and I have just read in the small print i had to let the court know 14 days prior and I had to send in my evidence 7 days before. I really have messed up here. I have sent my evidence today to be received tomorrow.
It's a case I am defending and I have a good chance of defending the case. Any advice anyone and also can I appeal if I can't attend.
Thankyou
Our solicitor received a claim from the people we bought our home from for additional removal fees (£900). He wrote back to their solicitors to say we were not responsible and that everything was done to complete the next day. The person liable was the bottom of the chain.
We were not aware that this conversation was happening between the solicitors and not consulted but have now been taken to the small claims court for the money.
It’s really stressful as our solicitor is now quoting us £1000-£3000 to represent us!
Any advice anyone can give would be grateful.
Can we pay it and then begin a claim against our buyer?
Do we have a leg stand on to dispute this?
Will we be issued a CCJ if we dispute it and lose?
I am about to take a car dealer to the small claim court, but would like to hear some advice before hand. I bought a used car on 04/12/2017 for £1250 and less then week later a car broke down. So I got in touch with the dealer and he agree to take it to the garage to repair. So after a lot of phone calls and some argueing been told car was done and ready to pick it up 10/01/2018 went there but car was in horrible engine nocking noise so I told them than I cant have this car as it clearly something wron with it and gave him second chance for repair. So on 16/01/2018 been told a car is ready again. Went pick it up ir sounded not perfect but much better, got my car back and the next day service light came up telling about check injection and car started knocking noise again. Phone again to dealer and garage to let them know about that, they told me bring a car to the scanner to have a look. I did this on 22/01/2018 and they told me they need to put another injectors into it. So I am so tyred of this nonsence and a garage is a hour away from where I live. Garage told me they been trying only second hand parts for repair which didnt go well. Please advice me in this if I can win a court because I cant go back and for to the garage again and again to waste my time and my holidays for taking a time off. He is already got 2 attemts to rapair and failed to do so.
Regards
Aleksandr
It would be £100 which would be more expensive than just doing another claim.
Thanks!
As he still owes me over £2000
I am an art director starting a new business and recently pulled together a team of models, make up, photographer for a fashion shoot. I found the photographer on a Creative Network site. She replied to a post I put up asking for free collaborations, i.e. we all work together creatively and all have portfolio shots at the end of it.
The shoot happened and she has now gone quiet on giving me the shots. I have been trying to get them for 3 weeks now. She has not replied to any texts/emails for the last week. I sent her an email last night saying how unhappy I was about the whole situation as she has basically relayed on the agreement to give us all of the shots. How do I stand with this legally to get her to hand the shots over ?
Thanks in advance
· Reports must be on letter headed paper or supported by a business card.
· The report must include the Company Registration Number and/or if applicable the Gas Safe number
· Reports must include:
· What the product is
· When was the product fitted and who by
· What the fault is
· How you came to find this fault
· What the fault has caused
· What the plumber believes the fault was caused by
· Was the fault caused by a manufacturing problem, damage or misuse
We did this and the plumber came to the conclusion that this was a manufacturing fault and was delamination
We sent the report to Victoria Plum together with a quotation from the plumber as to how much it would cost to remove the existing bath and replace it. They responded to this requesting that they required the plumber to state how the delamination has occurred which is crazy as it is obviously a manufacturing fault. Victoria Plum then stated that they are not willing to pay the associated costs for the remedial work involved in removing the old bath and replacing the new bath but as a gesture of good will they would be willing to replace the bath and pay for the plumbers report.
Do you think that this is worth taking to the small claims court as Victoria Plum won't budge
over three months ago i did some work at a customers house where while working some dust got onto the carpet and marked it i pointed out the problem and offered to have the carpet profesionally cleaned - the customer refused this and then asked for a new carpet and got quotes and tried to get me to pay direct but i passed on my insurance details instead
the customer failed to make a claim
then the customer again sent me a quote this time to pay for cleaning the carpet and furniture though no dust or damage went on the furniture i offered to clean the carpet again but this was refused and now hes taking me to court do i dispute the whole claim or part - at no point have i been allowed to arrange any cleaning nor have i been shown an actual paid invoice
As my home is in England and the arrangements were originally made there and the supplier is also based in England can I make a claim under the English small claims system or because the service was provided in Scotland do I have to claim under the Scottish system?
(2)
Can I invite the press into a hearing, indeed can I publish comments in the paper if they are true facts ?
A car dealer sold me a car which he didn't declare as a Cat C after being in an accident, this was after we asked him if the car had been in an accident , he told us no, we also asked had an HPI check been done, he answered yes it had and it was clear, we found out later from the V5 we were sent that it had been written off and then put back on road, so it is roadworthy and legal, we paid £1900 for 2004 plate mini, we think its only worth £700 so we are trying to claim back £1200 , he's refusing saying he wants car back, we saying we want to keep the car and want £1200 part refund, we are willing to negotiate and have sent him various letters which he has ignored, but we now get a letter saying he's closed the business, is this likely to get sorted through small claims court or will a judge get involved which could end up costing us more money, we have involved consumer advice and they in turn have involved trading standards. Would appreciate any comments, Thankyou.
The judgment was not in my favour.
Prior to the court hearing the court had ordered that the parties comply with the following directions
Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office no later than 14 days before the hearing
(i)Signed statements setting out the evidence of each party and all witnesses on which each party intends to rely
The defendant produced some evidence form a third party which was not sent to me and I think it was on the basis of that one sided evidence I may have lost the case
I realised that after the hearing and the judgement
Can I appeal on the grounds that there was substantial procedural or other irregularity?
If I had known earlier about the evidence from the third party I too could have obtained evidence from them in my favour
I feel I was disadvantaged because I was not a privy to that document 14 days before the hearing. If i did have that I could have prepared my defence differently
In one of the emails to the vendor my wife wrote that it would be nice that we can complete on 28/11/2012.
On the 1/12/2015 we informed the vendor that we didn't get a mortgage from the bank and our mortgage advisor said that we can get a mortgage from another bank. The vendor immediately put the property back on the market.
On the 8/12/2015 we got a mortgage offer from another bank but the offer was less than we expected so we ask the vendor if they can reduce the price of the house by £10K.
The vendor didn't reply to that email - they have already accepted another offer despite holding our pre-exchange deposit. They withdrawn from the offer.
We sent the vendor email to give us back the deposit. They responded that they were not going to give it back and they were going to keep it towards the costs of the Professional Certificate.
On the 2/01/2016 we sent them final letter to give us back deposit or we were going to take legal action. We made a small claim on 11/01/2016. The judgement was entered on 4/02/2016 against the vendor. On 15/02/2016 the vendor made an application to set aside the claim because apparently they didn't receive the initial forms.
Moreover on the 15/02/2016 the vendor made separate claim against us to get £1137 for Professional Consultant Certificate. We have never received the certificate. The certificate is a warranty on the property so it has no use for us because we did not purchase the property. They produced pro-forma invoice for the certificate. They paid 960£ for survey on 14/01/2015 which was 10 months before they even seen us.
Could you please give us opinion if they have chance to get that money back for that certificate.
Can I represent the landlord in the small claims court or does he have to attend? If not, would living abroad be a valid reason not to attend the court hearing, provided he gives the 7 days notice?
Due to a difficult executor who is my brother and refuses to finish estate estate. We had probate in may 2016 ( my father died 06/01/2014. Managedto get siblings paid out December 2015 but my brother is refusing any executors costs which amount to £260 for my sister and £6700 for my costs which nearly £5000 was to get brother to the table at solicitors he chose and we signed with,this was our second solicitor and nearly ended in court proceedings for direction. Our present solicitor we have had for one year had given brother many opportunities to sort including meetings but brother refused to attend. Is there any way it can be heard by judge without court.
Solicitor is now exhausted as us of situation and although estate modest approx £120,000 costs because of brother has nearly reached £20,000.
Entitlement to damages may be awarded if the innocent party can prove that a breach of contract took place. The innocent party must prove that there was a loss due to the breach and that the nature of the loss would lead to compensation. Remoteness of loss will also be taken into consideration by the courts and may include future loss that could reasonably occur from the contract being broken. I hope this helps.
AT THE DEFENDANTS ADDRESS THE CLAIMANT AND
THE DEFENDANT CO-HABITED AT THIS ADDRESS FOR
TWO YEARS AND FIVE MONTHS THE DEFENDANT HAS
NOT COMPLIED WITH CORRESPONDANCE SENT TO HER
SOLICITORS OR HERSELF ONCE LEGAL HER
SOLICITORS WERE NO LONGER INSTRUCTED IN
THIS MATTER AND AS SUCH HAS FAILED TO COMPLY
WITH DATES AND REQUESTS GIVEN FOR THE RETURN
OF THE CLAIMANTS PROPERTY. THE DEFENDANT HAS
AGREED THE LIST OF THE CLAIMANTS PROPERTY BUT
STATES THAT ITEMS WITHIN WOULD ONLY BE
RETURNED AT THE CONCLUSION OF FAMILY LAW
MATTERS THIS PASSED THE CLAIMANT HAS SENT
FURTHER REQUESTS FOR THE RETURN OF PROPERTY
AND NO AGREEMENT DATES HAVE BEEN DISCLOSED TO
THE CLAIMANT THE DEFENDANT STATES NOW TO THE
POLICE AND CLAIMANTS LEGAL BODY THAT SHE HAS
NONE OF THE CLAIMANTS PROPERTY AND THAT IT
HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF THE CLAIMANT SEEKS
EVIDENCE AND FULL MONETARY VALUE TO REPLACE
Can anyone tell me if I have a strong case
hearing is needed or not. Once the judge has made a decision about how much money the litigant is entitled to, both you, the defendent and the litigant will be sent an order. It will give the decision of the judge, or it may inform you that your claim has been given a hearing
date.
If a sepcified amount has been claimed and you have not responded then you will receive copies of this judgment and possible fines which will be recorded on the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines.
This is not something you can avoid and hope it will go away, if you want to defend yourself, you really do need to respond. I hope this helps.
thank you for your service to help those who are victims of police abuse 'color of law' and also victims of civil and constitutional rights suffered at the hands of uneducated and illegitimate cops.
I am being harassed by the local police department for no reason. I have been told that the current police chief doesn't like me. They follow me on a consistent basis, I have kept a log of this, Can I sue them for violation of my constitutional rights. I have committed no crime, Isn't this a violation of my constitutional right /my right to pursue my happiness-going places, visiting people, it's like America doesn't exist any longer. are freedoms are being taken by tyrannical henchmen . Our founding fathers would be so upset concerning these actions of our so-called fellow americans. I would like to sue the police department.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
Peter Seth Hoosac
Ask Courtroom Advice a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.